ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of preemptive nasogastric tube placement for improving nutritional status and clinical outcomes in hospitalized infants with congenital heart disease.Methods:Children from 0 to 12 months with congenital heart disease hospitalized in cardiovascular center of Children's Hospital of Fudan University from February to July 2018 were selected as control group through continuous sampling. Children hospitalized were selected from September 2018 to February 2019 as intervention group. The control group followed the current feeding method, the intervention group used preemptive nasogastric tube placement. The nutritional indicators, feeding indicators and clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared to evaluate the intervention effect.Results:The serum albumin and prealbumin of the children in the intervention group were (36.81±4.59) g/L and (162.74±48.17) g/L, which were higher than those in the control group (34.80±5.21) g/L and (142.98± 33.96) g/L, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( t values were -2.721, -3.169, both P<0.05); the daily enteral intake, calorie intake and single enteral calorie intake of children in the intervention group were (124.93±27.97) ml·kg -1·d -1, (376.48±88.53) kj·kg -1·d -1, (48.39±9.13) kj·kg -1·time -1, higher than the control group (114.74±30.63) ml·kg -1·d -1, (330.01±90.75) kj·kg -1·d -1, (44.24±13.31) kj·kg -1·time -1, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( t values were -2.511, -3.750, -2.382, all P<0.05). the incidence of feeding difficulties in the intervention group was 4.95% (5/101) lower than 14.68% (16/109) of the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( χ2 value was 5.513, P<0.05); the proportion of children in the intervention group reaching the target feeding amount when discharged from the hospital was 97.03% (98/101), higher than 84.40% (92/109) of the control group, the difference between the two groups was statistically significant ( χ2 value was 9.699, P<0.05). Conclusions:Preemptive nasogastric tube placement is safety and effectively for patients with congenital heart disease in clinical infants. but it still needs a large sample for a long time to confirm its effectiveness.
ABSTRACT
Objective To study the effect of evidence-based nursing in patients with cerebral apoplexy in ICU by blind bedside spiral nasointestinal tube application.Methods To choose between September 2016 and September 2017 in our hospital ICU were 140 cases of patients with cerebral apoplexy as analysis object,randomly divided into two groups,two groups all use bedside blind spiral nose long intestinal tube technology,the control group using conventional nursing method for nursing,observation group using evidence-based nursing intervention,compared two groups of a success rate of catheter,accident to take off the tube (unscheduled decannulation rate),reflux hiccups,vomiting incidence of aspiration and patient satisfaction.Results The success rate of catheterization in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the incidence of accidental catheterization was lower than that in the control group.The incidence of reflux hiccup and vomiting aspiration was significantly lower than that in the control group,and the patient satisfaction was higher than that in the control group (all P＜0.05).Conclusion For patients with cerebral apoplexy in the ICU bed of blind plug spiral nasal bowel technology combined evidence-based nursing intervention,clinical effect is remarkable,improve the success rate of catheter,reduces the surprise success rate of tube,unscheduled tube drawing number,reduces the incidence of reflux hiccups,vomiting aspiration,improve patient satisfaction and quality of life.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting after cardiac surgery is 30-40%.The role of a nasogastric tube for reducing the PONV is still controversial. METHODS: 92 patients who were undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to a receive nasogastric tube after induction of anesthesia (Group 2) or they were placed in the control group (no nasogastric tube) (Group 1).The patients with a history of gastric/esophageal surgery, esophageal varix, esophageal stricture and/or a history of antiemetic treatment were excluded.Routine fast-track cardiac anesthesia and postoperative care were employed for all the patients.The incidence of PONV was recorded hourly for the first four hours after extubation and then every 4 h afterwards for 24 h.The usage of antiemetics and pain medication was also recorded.The data was analyzed with t-tests and chi-square tests for the continuous variables and the categorical data, respectively.P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The groups were similar with respect to the demographic data, the surgical characteristics and the opioid usage.There was no significant difference in the incidence of PONV and the antiemetic usage between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that placement of a nasogastric tube did not have an impact on the incidence of PONV or the requirements for antiemetics after cardiac surgery.The results of this study do not support the use of a nasogastric tube to reduce PONV after cardiac surgery.